Challenges Enterprises Face in Adopting GenAI

September 9, 2025 John Foland
Enterprise GenAI at scale

Generative AI is rapidly capturing workforce mindshare and filling executive agendas across industries. Yet as organizations rush to implement GenAI, a sobering reality emerges. Many of these initiatives fall short of delivering real business value. At CruzAI, our mission is to bridge that gap by innovating to solve the practical, day-to-day challenges enterprises face on the path to meaningful GenAI adoption.

Below are some of the key pain points we’ve identified based on our research, observations, and insights from across the business world.

1. Hype & Misaligned Expectations

Many organizations are rushing into the GenAI space under pressure from stakeholders, which is largely fueled by supposition and hype. Like other transformational technologies, the potency of generative AI within enterprises is directly dependent upon its implementation. General purpose “blanket” deployments inevitably fall victim to the law of diminishing marginal returns.

2. Data Quality & Infrastructure Limitations

Foundation models are only as good as their training data. Enterprises often struggle with fragmented, inconsistent, or low-quality data: 54–56% of organizations report this as a major barrier to GenAI adoption. Compounded by weak infrastructure and limited injection of proprietary data, this makes customization and reliable output difficult.

3. Talent Gaps, Cultural Resistance & Leadership Vision

AI systems with advanced capabilities need proper strategic planning to function safely and effectively. Organizations struggle to implement GenAI at scale because they have neither a clear strategic direction nor sufficient leadership support. The implementation of new tools also faces opposition from within organizations because employees often view them as job threats and workflow disruptors. For organizations to successfully implement and scale these technologies, leadership must drive workforce education, cultural adoption, and cross-functional governance.

4. Trust, Accuracy & Hallucinations

At its core, GenAI is wholly probabilistic in nature, depending on statistical distribution models to drive reasoning and generate outputs, meaning that results can vary dramatically. By properly sanitizing inputs and controlling sample settings, outputs can be substantially improved. Businesses can leverage this best by implementing systems and applications that shape the model outputs based on specific use cases, such as:

  • More probabilistic parameters for creative marketing use cases to brainstorm and evaluate different tag lines or in content creation
  • More deterministic parameters for customer-facing and compliance workflows where consistency is key

Without transparency or interpretability, organizations hesitate to rely on GenAI, even for routine decisions.

5. Security, Governance & Ethical Risks

“Shadow AI”, an industry term that describes the phenomenon where employees bypass sanctioned tools to use consumer chatbots, complicates governance and introduces serious data leakage and compliance risks. With many knowledge-workers having become accustomed to using consumer GenAI tools in their personal lives, and with a significant subset of that cohort under the (entirely understandable) misperception that these tools have superior capabilities to their enterprise-sanctioned counterparts, employees facing productivity pressures often bypass approved tools. Meanwhile, less than half of enterprises currently have governance structures in place, despite growing regulatory pressure and the ever-present necessity to protect company data.

6. High Rate of Failed Pilots and Poor ROI

A recent MIT study, as shared by Fortune, revealed that up to 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots deliver zero measurable ROI. This isn’t model capacity, it’s an integration gap, where AI tools summarily fail to connect meaningfully with workflows, absorb context, and deliver real business impact.

This gap persists when systems lack memory, fail to align with critical workflows, or require users to constantly “double-check” outputs, resulting in what industry experts call the “verification tax”, which erodes trust and productivity.

CruzAI’s Perspective: Turning Pain into Purpose

At CruzAI, we’ve transmuted these pain points into inspiration. Here’s how we address them:

  • Operational integration, not add-ons: We design GenAI to connect into existing workflows, eliminating verification drag and garnering trust.
  • Data-first readiness: We enable clean, safe, and unified access to enterprise data, whether siloed, proprietary, structured or unstructured.
  • Governance baked in: Corporate vulnerability disappears when governance, auditability, and policy enforcement are built into the platform, not layered on later.
  • Compelling innovation: Shadow AI diminishes when enterprise users are genuinely satisfied by the power and flexibility of company sanctioned tools.
  • Trust through design: We include transparency, consistent memory, and performance monitoring, reducing hallucinations and building user confidence.

Empowerment over consulting: Our API-first architecture supports and emboldens internal teams, enabling them to lead experimentation with support, not outsourcing control.

The GenAI era demands more than experimentation; it requires a strategic, business-aligned approach. The enterprises that succeed will be those that move past hype, address structural challenges, and embed GenAI with trust, governance, and sustainability. At CruzAI, we’re committed to helping enterprises navigate this transformation, not through checkboxes, but through practical innovation that scales. If you’re looking to unlock GenAI’s potential within your organization, let’s connect and explore how CruzAI can empower your business.